Back when I was in undergrad, we had an Acting Concentration
and there were fourteen of us in our cohort.
Tonya and Ryan were the couple of our group. They had been since senior year of high
school and they still were together after we graduated. They were lovely people, and talented. But, they were both incredibly insecure and
sensitive, making them an often dysfunctional couple. Tonya was usually in tears in the bathroom
once a week over some quarrel they’d had, or Ryan was moping about because of
something Tonya had said. While it was
clear they cared for each other, it was also a big case of young
love/co-dependency. Which is fine. You see that a lot in young relationships,
right?
So how does this relate to theatre?
In undergrad, we were taking an “Actor/Director
Collaboration” class, led by Marshall W. Mason. Actors were partnered with the
seniors in the Directing Concentration.
Each week, one director had to have a scene work session with two actors
while the rest of the class observed.
Ron was directing Tonya and Ryan. I can’t remember exactly, but I think the
scene was from Angels in America. This particular week, the assignment was to
do improvisations with the actors as their characters to help deepen the
exploration of their scene work.
Marshall would observe the director/actors and make suggestions/side
coach as needed. Normally, the director
came up with imaginary circumstances to create an improv. For example, with Joe
and Harper in Angels, he could has
set up the circumstances as being when they first met, their first date, or an
argument they’d previously had (like maybe the first time he caught her taking
valium). The director would send one
actor out of the room and give the other the improv parameters. Such as, “Harper, you guys just moved to New
York. You’ve been feeling down, so
you’ve been to see the doctor who prescribed you valium. You’re only supposed to take one at a time,
but in the past few weeks, you’ve started taking more. Today, you’ve taken three. You’re feeling really good, but you don’t
want Joe to know.” Then the actors would
trade places and the director would say, “Joe, you had a terrible day at
work. You want to vent, but don’t want
Harper to see you unhappy, because it will upset her.” Ok, go!
But Ron, who was (and still is) a very innovative director,
opted to try something different. He
sent Tonya out of the room first. And
then he told Ryan the following:
“Ok, you’re going to be doing an improv where you play
yourself. You and Tonya were at a party
last night. You got in an argument and
you left. Today, you heard from a friend
that she got drunk and slept with someone else.
Your objective is to confront her and get her to tell you the truth.”
Then he called Tonya into the room and told her the
following:
“You and Ryan were at a party last night. You got in a fight and Ryan left. You had a few beers and started chatting with
some guy. He started to get handsy
though, and he forced you into a bedroom and raped you.”
Yikes. This was not
our typical set-up for an improv exercise.
I was already uncomfortable before the improv began, knowing the
somewhat volatile and vulnerable relationship Tonya and Ryan had. The director
was breaking the (unwritten) rules of our “safe space”. How could things not go badly?
Ryan began the improv by asking, “Did you sleep with someone
else?” Tonya, sticking to her objective didn’t answer. Ryan began to freak out and started to yell
things like, “Did you fuck him?” and “How could you do this to us?” Tonya sat
on the stacked wrestling mats that were serving as a bed, saying, “I’m sorry” over
and over while Ryan proceeded to scream at her.
She began to cry, then sob, and Ryan followed suit. Soon, both were near hysterical. I sat frozen at first, but then started to
raise my hand. Others were looking
around, shifting in their seats uncomfortably.
Oddly, our professor didn’t intervene.
I started waving my hand in the air, as some other students did. Finally,
Ron called, “Hold!” and said, “How was that?” Ryan and Tonya seemed to nod
approval. I looked around the room and
met eyes with a few other classmates, as if to say, “What the fuck?” The energy in the room was so weird- I felt
like I just witnessed something that was none of my business. And though the circumstances were fabricated,
my two classmates playing themselves was just too creepy and too weird. It didn’t feel like they were acting. As we continued to mumble and shift in our seats,
Ryan and Tonya wiped their eyes and Ron told them to focus, and get ready to
start the scene. One of my classmates
stood up at that point and said, “Hey, I feel really uncomfortable right
now.” To which there was a chorus of,
“Yeah” and “Me, too”. The director said
to Ryan and Tonya, “Are you ok? Do you want to do the scene?” Both of them were still mopping their tears
and snot away and nodding vigorously.
They started the scene and did some really intense, weepy work- not to
be confused with good work. When the
scene ended our professor finally asked the two of them what they felt. And Ryan and Tonya both said, “This was
great- exactly what I needed!” Ron
smiled and said, “I had a feeling this would work for you two.” Was that his directorial “wink”? Because his improv had messed with the minds
of two vulnerable 20- year-old actors? And
they started to set up to do the scene again!
At that point, someone else said, “I’m not watching that again.” Another student got up and left. I sat, frozen, waiting for my professor to
intervene again, or to scold Ron. He did
not. Rather, he praised him for taking
such as risk and getting his actors to “that place”. We, as the observers, began to express our
discomfort. But we weren’t heard or vindicated.
It's been years since I thought about this story, but as I
tell it, the uneasiness settles back in. I feel like, while it was a bold move
to try out a sort of “real life” improv, it went too far. The director was friends with this couple and
knew how sensitive they both were. He
exploited that information when he put them into a “reality improv” and took
them away from the idea of living truthfully in imaginary circumstance. Instead, he put them into an uncomfortable
situation that was more like some fucked up therapy session. Witnessing it was awful, at least for me and
a few others. But I did have classmates and a professor who thought this was a genius move by a creative director. Perhaps a dialogue could have been had with our professor discuss the "too real-ness" of performance. Not being heard while being an undergraduate acting student made me question my security in the classroom. But maybe for Ryan and Tonya, the exercise did truly help them. I just wonder at what cost.
What do
you think?
Wow! That must have been uncomfortable. I think sometimes people conflate "good" or "realistic" acting with a high amount of trauma or suffering. While there is something to be said for sense memory and a willingness to "go there," I find myself asking if the ends justified the means-- especially when there are likely healthier ways to get there that may just take a little longer.
ReplyDeleteRon reminds me of a student I worked with in undergrad. He was fixated on the artistic temperament and often vocally glorified trauma, mental illness, etc as a means of achieving the best/realest performance. During class we were warming up by practicing plastiques and connecting to emotions that pertained to our scene work through physical exploration. Suddenly, I heard a scream from the other side of the room. He had dug his nails into his face and scratched downward to the point of drawing blood. Suffice to say, the room was uncomfortable. That particular gesture was a bit *too real* for me. I also did not feel that his choice of warm up activity made his performance any more realistic than it was on days that were less self-destructive. That said, I'd take that over what Ron put everyone through any day! I think you really hit the nail on the head when you said: "at what cost."